Best marketing agencies for cybersecurity companies in 2026

By Peter Korpak Updated

Quick take: Security vendors needing top-tier media and analyst access — especially UK/EU and global: Eskenzi PR (100% cybersecurity-dedicated, 7-year avg. client tenure) or Touchdown PR (multi-market, VC-backed scaleups). Full-service PR plus demand gen under one roof: PAN Communications. Outsourced pipeline across NAMER and EMEA: memoryBlue (formerly Operatix) (G2 #1 of 661, named clients include CrowdStrike and SentinelOne). Full comparison below.

Generic B2B marketing agencies underperform for cybersecurity companies for three interconnected reasons. First: fear-message saturation. Open fifty cybersecurity firm websites and read the hero sections — “protect your business,” “stay ahead of threats,” “your security partner.” The visual language is identical. Buyers have developed defenses against it. According to Merritt Group’s CISO survey cited in SC Magazine, 64% of CISOs rely on peer colleagues as their primary vendor research source. The top vendor turn-offs: excessive email (30%) and cold calling (25%). Generic outreach and fear-based advertising are doing the exact opposite of what the buyer wants.

Second: paid search economics make the category hostile to generalists. Google Ads CPC in cybersecurity averages $38.50 in 2026, with top keywords exceeding $95 and enterprise demo CPAs of $420 to $680. At those numbers, outspending the category is reserved for well-funded SaaS vendors. For MSSPs, vCISO firms, GRC consultancies, and pen test shops, the only path that compounds on reasonable economics is outpositioning the category — framework expertise plus sub-vertical specificity — not paying premium CPCs to drive traffic to a homepage that looks like everyone else’s. A general B2B agency optimizing for paid conversion in a category with those economics will exhaust budget quickly.

Third: AI-search invisibility is now a pipeline problem. GrackerAI’s February 2026 benchmark tested 100 cybersecurity companies across six AI platforms with 250 prompts. Seventy-three percent received zero ChatGPT citations when buyers searched for vendor recommendations in their category. The firms getting cited have framework-specific, practitioner-authored content and earned-media presence in security publications. A general B2B agency does not have the editorial relationships to build that presence.

How we built this list

This is not a pay-to-play list. No agency paid for inclusion. We evaluated agencies against five criteria: cybersecurity-specific media and analyst relationships (depth of editorial contacts at security publications and Gartner/Forrester-tier analyst firms), named security clients as independently verifiable evidence of delivery, demand-gen versus PR capability balance, evidence quality (G2 and Clutch ratings cited with review counts; on-site self-claims flagged as such), and geographic fit.

On-site self-claims were separated from independently verifiable facts throughout. When an agency says it has “80+ security clients” with no named examples, that is a claim. When a client roster includes CrowdStrike, Tenable, and SentinelOne, that is independently verifiable. The distinction matters when you are making a $100k+ agency decision.

100Signals is intentionally not listed here. We run a coordinated Authority + Pipeline program for cybersecurity services firms — positioning, content, SEO, AI visibility, and outbound under one niche thesis — which is a different category than any single-channel agency on this list. The agencies here are the right choice when one channel is the whole problem; our program is the right choice when the problem is coordination across all of them. For the underlying playbook, see the marketing for cybersecurity companies hub.

What to look for in a cybersecurity marketing agency

CriterionWhy it mattersRed flag
Cybersecurity-specific media and analyst relationships Security buyers read Dark Reading, SC Media, CyberScoop, and The Record — not general tech press. Analyst coverage in Gartner and Forrester security Magic Quadrants carries direct sales-cycle weight. An agency without established editorial contacts in these specific outlets will pitch wide and land thin. Agency case studies cite only general business press or consumer media. No named contacts at security-specific publications.
Named security clients with verifiable delivery Any agency can claim a "cybersecurity vertical." Named clients — public references, verifiable case studies — are the only independent signal of whether that vertical is real or a marketing category on a services page. Agency lists "cybersecurity" as a vertical with no named clients. Case studies are anonymized or vague about the client's actual security category.
Demand-gen versus PR capability clarity PR builds entity authority and analyst relationships; demand gen builds pipeline. These are different problems requiring different skills and different teams. Agencies that claim to do both equally well often do neither particularly well. Be explicit about which problem you are solving before you select a partner. Agency pitches "full-service" without explaining how PR and demand gen are structured differently. Account teams span both capabilities with no apparent specialization in either.
Evidence quality: G2/Clutch ratings with review counts A 5.0 rating across 3 reviews tells you almost nothing. A 4.7 rating across 108 reviews is a meaningful signal. Cite both the score and the review count when evaluating any agency. High scores on low review counts can reflect selection bias in who the agency asks to submit reviews. Agency quotes a perfect review score without disclosing how many reviews it is based on. Third-party review profile is absent or thin.
Geographic fit for your target buyers EMEA media relationships are structurally different from US relationships. An agency whose journalist network is primarily UK-based will struggle to land placement in US security trades, and vice versa. Federal and commercial cybersecurity buyers have different procurement contexts. Confirm whether the agency has operational depth in the markets you are actually trying to reach. Agency claims global reach without explaining where their actual editorial relationships are concentrated. Office locations listed with no explanation of which teams handle which markets.

Why listen to us

This list is written by 100Signals. Peter Korpak, the founder, spent seven years heading marketing at Brainhub, one of Europe's largest software development agencies, running 300+ campaigns for dev agencies and IT companies. That experience gives us a specific research lens: we know which agencies build authority that generates pipeline and which ones generate reports. 100Signals is not included in this agency list because we do not sell this service as a standalone channel. The agencies listed are better fits when that channel is the whole problem; the separate 100Signals note explains when a coordinated Authority or Pipeline program is the better category.

Methodology

Each agency was evaluated across five dimensions: cybersecurity-specific media and analyst relationships (depth of editorial contacts at security press and Gartner/Forrester-tier analyst firms), named security clients as independent evidence of delivery, demand-gen versus PR capability balance, evidence quality (G2 and Clutch ratings cited with review counts; on-site self-claims flagged as claims), and geographic fit for the buyer's target markets. On-site self-claims were separated from independently verifiable facts throughout. No agency paid for inclusion. Agencies are organized by use-case category, not ranking.

9 agencies reviewed

Best for cybersecurity PR and analyst relations

Eskenzi PR

Visit →

Eskenzi PR says it is the only global PR agency dedicated entirely to cybersecurity — a claim that has held up across 30 years of operation and 200+ named security clients. Named clients include Varonis, Tenable, AT&T Cybersecurity, Dragos, Red Canary, and KnowBe4, an unusually transparent client roster for an agency of this size. The 7-year average client tenure is the most credible signal in their public positioning: PR retainers that don't produce results don't renew at that rate. The Queen's Award for Enterprise in 2018 adds independent validation. What they actually deliver is editorial access — journalist and analyst relationships built inside cybersecurity specifically, not borrowed from a general B2B tech practice. That depth is the reason their placements land in security trades and tier-one business press rather than being distributed to a wide list and hoping something sticks. The honest limitation: this is a PR shop. If your problem is pipeline and you need outbound, LinkedIn, or paid media, you will need a separate partner. Eskenzi runs one channel, and they run it well.

Specialization

100% cybersecurity-dedicated PR and marketing: global media and analyst relations, crisis communications, thought leadership, and spokesperson training.

Best for

Security vendors needing consistent top-tier media placement and analyst access, particularly in EU, UK, and global markets. Established vendors with named clients and verifiable track records.

Not ideal for

Firms that need demand generation, paid media, ABM, or SDR alongside PR. Eskenzi is PR-focused; expect to layer a separate demand-gen partner for full-funnel coverage.

Pricing

Retainer-based. Enterprise cybersecurity PR pricing.

Touchdown PR

Visit →

Touchdown PR runs B2B tech media and analyst relations across US, EU, and APAC from offices in the UK, US, and internationally. Their cybersecurity vertical is documented through named clients — HackerOne, Aqua Security, Exabeam, and Glasswall — which provides independently verifiable evidence rather than category claims. PRWeek ranked them #7 UK Tech PR agency, a third-party signal that reflects genuine editorial relationships rather than self-reported results. The 70+ person team makes them large enough to run coordinated multi-market campaigns without the geographic gaps that affect smaller agencies. For VC-backed security companies expanding from one market to several simultaneously, the infrastructure is there. Two honest notes: their strength is PR, not marketing execution, so demand generation and ABM will require a separate engagement. And pre-product startups will find that the model works best when there is a real story to amplify — Touchdown places earned media, which requires something genuinely earned.

Specialization

B2B tech PR with a documented cybersecurity vertical; media and analyst relations for VC-backed security startups and enterprise brands across US, EU, and APAC.

Best for

VC-backed security scaleups needing multi-market PR across US, EU, and APAC simultaneously. Firms post-Series A with enough product differentiation to sustain a media narrative.

Not ideal for

Pre-product startups without a media-ready story. Firms needing marketing execution beyond PR — Touchdown is media and analyst relations, not a full-service marketing partner.

Pricing

Retainer-based. B2B tech PR pricing.

PAN Communications

Visit →

PAN Communications has been named PRWeek 2025 Outstanding Technology Agency of the Year — recognition that reflects depth in B2B tech editorial relationships rather than general agency credentials. Their cybersecurity practice focuses on AI security, critical infrastructure, and national security, which is more specific than the generic 'cybersecurity' vertical most agencies claim. Named security clients include Vercara and ThreatX. The acquisition of BLASTmedia (now operating as PANBlast) added a pipeline-attributed SaaS PR capability, which means earned media can be measured against sales cycle outcomes rather than impression counts alone. For security vendors at the growth-to-enterprise stage, the integration of PR, content, and demand gen under one positioning is the primary argument for PAN. The honest limitation: the model requires budget to run all three channels, and firms at early stage or sub-$10k/month investment will use only a fraction of what makes PAN effective.

Specialization

Integrated B2B tech PR, content, and demand generation with a dedicated cybersecurity practice covering AI security, critical infrastructure, and national security.

Best for

Growth-stage to enterprise security firms wanting PR, content marketing, and demand generation run under one agency relationship. Firms that have tried running those channels separately and found the gaps.

Not ideal for

Firms needing pure SDR or appointment-setting; sub-$10,000/month budgets. PAN's integrated model is priced for firms with sufficient scale to use all three channels.

Pricing

Retainer-based. Enterprise B2B technology pricing; minimum engagement typically above $10,000/month.

Best for full-service marketing and brand

Merritt Group

Visit →

Merritt Group's security practice has supported what the firm says are 80+ cybersecurity clients from their McLean, Virginia base — a location that reflects genuine federal proximity, not marketing positioning. Named clients include CrowdStrike, Venafi, Black Hat, Telos, Checkmarx, and BlueVoyant, which provides an independently verifiable sample across commercial and federal segments. The 'Selling to the CISO' survey they publish annually is substantive research rather than content marketing: it produces data that journalists actually cite, which matters for earned authority. One honest note on reviews: Clutch shows only four reviews, which is a low sample relative to the named-client roster. Weight the named-client evidence, not the review count. The federal adjacency is the real differentiator. For cybersecurity vendors in the defense industrial base, civilian federal, or dual-use commercial/federal space, Merritt Group understands the procurement context and messaging constraints that general B2B agencies get wrong.

Specialization

Full-service B2B marketing, PR, and digital with a dedicated security practice; documented commercial and federal/government cybersecurity reach.

Best for

Security vendors with federal or government adjacency. Firms that need a marketing partner who understands how DoD and civilian agency procurement cycles affect messaging and timing.

Not ideal for

Pure-play commercial startups with no federal angle. Buyers wanting a PR-only engagement without the broader marketing and digital layer.

Pricing

Retainer and project-based. Enterprise B2B marketing pricing.

Bluetext

Visit →

Bluetext operates out of Washington DC, which tells you something about the clients they understand. Their named client roster — FireEye, Intel, Cisco — reflects enterprise-grade security work rather than startup positioning. Clutch shows 4.9/5 across 10 reviews, a strong signal for a creative agency where subjective quality is the primary variable. The M&A and IPO preparation focus is specific and important: rebrands timed to acquisition or public market events have different requirements than organic brand refreshes, and agencies without experience in that context routinely make decisions that complicate the transaction narrative. The $100,000+ minimum reflects the production quality required for the work they do — website redesigns and brand systems for enterprise security vendors are not scoped at $30k. The honest limitation is scope: Bluetext does creative and digital, not pipeline. If demand generation or outbound is your primary problem, you need a separate partner. If brand and web are the bottleneck — and you have budget — Bluetext is one of the most specific options in the category.

Specialization

Cybersecurity-focused creative and digital marketing — branding, web design, and campaign execution — with particular depth in M&A, IPO preparation, and defense/federal positioning.

Best for

Security vendors preparing for acquisition, IPO, or a significant rebrand. Federal and defense-sector cybersecurity companies needing creative and digital work that reflects the buyer expectations of that market.

Not ideal for

Firms needing SDR, outbound, or demand-gen execution — Bluetext is creative and digital, not pipeline development. Early-stage startups with lean budgets: they require a $100,000+ project minimum.

Pricing

Fixed-fee model. $100,000+ minimum project.

SAGE Marketing

Visit →

SAGE Marketing earns 5.0/5 across 24 Clutch reviews, which is a difficult rating to sustain at that review volume — it reflects consistent delivery rather than a handful of exceptional engagements. The HubSpot Diamond Partner designation is an operational credential, not a marketing claim: it means they have passed HubSpot's technical and performance standards across client accounts. Their model is fractional-CMO marketing — they take on the strategy-plus-execution role that a full-time CMO would fill, without the overhead of a full-time hire. This model is particularly well-matched to Israeli cybersecurity startups entering North American or European markets, where the firm needs both strategic clarity and in-market execution simultaneously. Founded in Tel Aviv with offices in London and Dubai, the geographic footprint matches the international expansion motion. The honest limitation: if you have a functioning marketing team in place and need a specific channel executed — PR, outbound, paid — SAGE's full-stack CMO model may be more than the problem requires.

Specialization

Full-stack outsourced and fractional-CMO marketing for cybersecurity and tech startups, with a documented track record of positioning Israeli security companies for US and EU market entry.

Best for

Israeli and early-stage security startups expanding to North America or Europe without a marketing leadership team in place. Founders who need strategic marketing direction before they can hire a CMO.

Not ideal for

US-based firms not targeting international expansion or go-global positioning. Companies needing pure PR or SDR execution without the fractional-CMO leadership layer.

Pricing

$5,000+ minimum. Typical project range $50,000–$199,000.

Ironpaper

Visit →

Ironpaper runs B2B demand generation with a specific focus on account-based marketing, buying-committee mapping, and HubSpot-native execution. Their G2 rating sits at 4.8/5, which reflects strong operational delivery from clients who are primarily managing the relationship through the platform. The buying-committee mapping approach is the right methodology for cybersecurity sales cycles, where a CISO, a VP of IT, a compliance officer, and a procurement lead may all have veto power at different stages — single-persona demand gen misses most of that committee. One honest caveat: Ironpaper has strong cybersecurity positioning on their site, but few publicly named security clients surfaced during evaluation. The G2 rating and methodology are credible; the cybersecurity depth should be verified directly with the agency before engaging. They are a demand-gen partner, not a PR partner — firms that need media and analyst access will need to layer a separate relationship.

Specialization

B2B ABM, demand generation, and content for cybersecurity firms; HubSpot-native with a buying-committee mapping approach.

Best for

Mid-market security vendors running structured ABM programs with HubSpot as the central platform. Firms that have a defined ICP and need the demand-gen layer built and executed.

Not ideal for

Firms needing media relations, PR, or analyst access — Ironpaper is demand generation, not earned media. Federal-focused vendors whose buying motion differs significantly from commercial ABM.

Pricing

$150–$199/hour.

Best for cybersecurity media reach and audience

CyberRisk Alliance

Visit →

CyberRisk Alliance is not a traditional marketing agency, and framing it as one would misrepresent what makes it valuable. CRA is a cybersecurity-only media and data company that operates SC Media, Security Weekly, MSSP Alert, ChannelE2E, InfoSec World, and Identiverse — the publications and events where CISOs, SOC leaders, and MSSP practitioners actually spend time. The marketing services CRA offers sit on top of that owned-audience infrastructure: native advertising, sponsored research, lead generation, and audience intelligence that a standalone agency cannot replicate without the underlying media properties. For security vendors that need to reach practitioner buyers at scale — not broad B2B awareness, but actual security practitioners in defined roles — the audience access is the differentiator. The clear limitation is scope: CRA delivers media reach and marketing programs against their owned audience; it does not provide brand strategy, outbound development, or the integrated marketing execution that a traditional agency relationship includes.

Specialization

Cybersecurity-only media, data, and marketing-services company with integrated marketing and lead generation across owned media properties: SC Media, Security Weekly, MSSP Alert, ChannelE2E, InfoSec World, and Identiverse.

Best for

Security vendors needing direct native reach into practitioner buyers — CISOs, SOC leaders, MSSPs, and channel partners — through the publications those buyers already read. Firms that want audience intelligence alongside media placement.

Not ideal for

Firms wanting a traditional agency relationship with brand strategy, creative, or a dedicated SDR team. CRA is a media and marketing-services company, not an agency — the model is distribution and audience access, not the full marketing-services stack.

Pricing

Program-based pricing. Varies by media property and campaign scope.

Best for outsourced sales development

memoryBlue

Visit →

memoryBlue (formerly Operatix, acquired 2023) runs outsourced SDR operations with a dedicated cybersecurity pod — SDRs trained on security buyer personas, compliance-driven buying cycles, and the specific language that CISOs and security architects respond to. The firm says it has served 250+ cybersecurity vendors, and the named client roster — CrowdStrike, Proofpoint, Recorded Future, Qualys, SentinelOne, CyberArk — is independently verifiable and reflects the enterprise tier. G2 rates them #1 of 661 lead-generation providers at 4.6/5; Clutch shows 4.7/5 across 23 reviews. The 22-language capability and NAMER/EMEA/LATAM/APAC coverage matters for security vendors that sell globally: outbound in the buyer's language and timezone is a material conversion variable, not a feature to mention in passing. The founding 2012 date reflects Operatix's history; the memoryBlue acquisition combined the European reach with an established North American SDR operation. The honest limitation: this is pipeline development, not marketing. Firms that need positioning, content, or media presence alongside outbound will need to manage a separate agency relationship.

Specialization

Outsourced SDR and sales acceleration with a dedicated cybersecurity pod; personalized outbound across NAMER, EMEA, LATAM, and APAC in 22 languages.

Best for

Security vendors needing outsourced pipeline development at scale, particularly across EMEA and global markets. Established vendors with a defined ICP and messaging ready for SDR execution.

Not ideal for

Firms needing content, PR, or brand work — memoryBlue is pipeline and outbound, not marketing. SMBs wanting low-volume, highly bespoke outreach; the model is built for scale, not boutique personalization.

Pricing

Enterprise pricing. Custom based on engagement scope, geography, and pod size.

The bottom line

Security vendors needing top-tier media placement and analyst access — especially in EU/UK and global markets — should evaluate Eskenzi PR (100% cybersecurity-dedicated, 200+ named clients over 30 years) or Touchdown PR (multi-market PR for VC-backed scaleups). For security firms that want PR, content, and demand gen under one roof, PAN Communications combines an integrated B2B tech practice with the PANBlast SaaS pipeline methodology. Firms preparing for acquisition, IPO, or a major rebrand in the federal/defense space will find Bluetext or Merritt Group a better fit than a pure-PR shop. Israeli and early-stage vendors entering NA/EU without a marketing team should look at SAGE Marketing (Clutch 5.0/24 reviews, HubSpot Diamond Partner). Mid-market vendors running structured HubSpot ABM belong on Ironpaper's shortlist. Security firms needing direct practitioner reach into CISOs, SOC leaders, and MSSPs — without a traditional agency relationship — should evaluate CyberRisk Alliance as a media and marketing-services partner. For pipeline development across NAMER and EMEA, memoryBlue (formerly Operatix) is the most documented SDR option in the category.

The harder question

You read the comparison. When a buyer asks an AI which firm to hire, does yours come up?

We run AI visibility scans on consulting firms, IT companies, and software development agencies. You get a report in 24 hours with your visibility score, where you appear in AI answers, who gets recommended instead, what AI thinks your firm is, and the gaps worth fixing first.

No call. No cost. If we find nothing useful, we say so.

Free. 24 hours delivery. No call required.

FAQ
What makes a cybersecurity marketing agency different from a general B2B agency?
Two things: buyer psychology and media access. Cybersecurity buyers — CISOs, security architects, compliance leads — have been saturated with fear-based messaging and are acutely skeptical of generic marketing. An agency without experience in this buyer segment will default to threat amplification, which is exactly what buyers tune out. The second difference is journalist and analyst access. Security trades (SC Media, Dark Reading, CyberScoop, The Record) and analyst firms (Gartner, Forrester, IDC) have specific editorial criteria for cybersecurity content. An agency that primarily covers enterprise software or fintech will not have the relationship depth to earn those placements consistently.
How much do cybersecurity marketing agencies cost?
Pricing varies sharply by service type. PR retainers from specialist firms like Eskenzi or Touchdown typically run $8,000–$20,000+/month for a mid-market engagement. Full-service marketing agencies like Merritt Group and SAGE Marketing commonly scope projects in the $50,000–$200,000 range. Ironpaper charges $150–$199/hour. Bluetext requires a $100,000+ project minimum. Outsourced SDR operations (memoryBlue, formerly Operatix) are enterprise-priced and typically quote per engagement scope. The meaningful comparison is not monthly fee — it is cost per qualified conversation with a CISO or VP of Security, which varies widely by channel mix and ICP specificity.
PR agency vs. demand-gen agency — which does a cybersecurity firm need first?
It depends on what is breaking. If no one in your target market has heard of you, or if analyst relationships and media presence are blocking enterprise deals, a PR agency fixes that first. If you have brand recognition but the pipeline is thin — outbound is flat, inbound is inconsistent — demand gen is the lever. The two are not mutually exclusive, and the best outcomes usually come from firms that treat earned media and demand generation as linked: PR creates the entity authority that makes outbound land, and demand gen converts the trust that PR builds. Doing one without the other is common and usually explains why each channel underperforms on its own.
Do cybersecurity startups need a specialist agency?
For early-stage firms (pre-Series A or sub-$3M ARR), a specialist agency may be more than you need if the problem is still positioning, not distribution. Fix the positioning — which framework, which sub-vertical, which buyer — before engaging an agency to amplify it. Once the message is specific enough that buyers self-select, a specialist agency accelerates it. The firms that overspend at the agency layer usually haven't made the positioning choices that give an agency something real to work with. For Series A and beyond, specialist agencies with security media and analyst access are substantially more effective than general B2B agencies, because the editorial relationships and buyer-language fluency compound quickly.
How do you measure cybersecurity marketing agency performance?
Avoid measuring by impressions or clip counts alone. The metrics that connect to revenue: qualified pipeline attributed to marketing (meetings with real buyers, not downloads from adjacent personas), analyst coverage placement (Gartner and Forrester mentions in relevant Magic Quadrants or Wave reports), media placement quality (Dark Reading or SC Media placements matter more than general business press for security buyers), and AI citation rate (whether the firm gets cited when buyers ask ChatGPT or Perplexity for vendor recommendations in your category). PR agencies that report only on reach and impressions are optimizing for metrics that don't reliably connect to the security sales cycle.

See where your cybersecurity firm's marketing has the biggest gap.

Free. No call. Results in 24 hours.

Ready to build the foundation?

Start with Niche Authority when the scan shows enough signal to validate one niche with real market response.

Start with Authority